orn with heart
     augmentation). Nov. 1999: an immigration officer (M-me Roy), not a M.D.
illegally intervenes in evaluation of the medical matters,
     makes  a decision  based  on  it (Doc.  7a,7b).  However,  she  quickly
replaces that decision - recognizing my mother's marriage. In
     violation of  the marriage  interview stage  requirements IMS release a
negative decision before med. exams (Doc. 7a). 2000: an entire
     year of mockery, ungrounded orders for innumerable additional tests and
exams, punitive threatening letters and calls. Goals: a) to
     damage my mother's heath, b) clear dr. Brzezinska and M-me Roy (Doc. 14
-17). For two months after her "medical saga"
     Immigration was refusing to give any answer/explanation. Now (Dec.) IMS
made a final negative ruling, based on Mrs. Bezezinska's
     insinuation  in spite of new  contradicting to  it results  and medical
opinions (anatomy, not pathology). (Also dr. Brzezinska never in 5
     years   sent  my  mother  for   cardiac   or  kidney   tests,   or   to
cardiologist/urologist, and never prescribed her any medication for
     heart/kidney  problems). It  is outraged that  the whole year  IMS  was
evaluating not actual but eventual health problems - and
     confirmed  initial  inhuman  decision!  (Doc.   25).  If  the  horrible
diagnosis (Doc. 25a), with which they crucified my mother, were correct,
     how could  she live a normal life all 6  years without medications  and
cardiologist? If my mother's heath declined after one year of
     humiliations -  Immigration officials  must  be  fully  responsible for
that. This is what they did it to punish me!

     Actions  to  influence   or  even   administratively   invade   medical
institutions and personnel for extorting false medical reports, creation of
     false  medical  documents  were committed  in both  my mother's  and my
cases. Tricks with my x-ray, delivery of receipts or calls for
     tests I've never done, other  manipulations are threat  to my own heath
or even life! (Doc. 1-7, 9-25). Our children are tremendously
     suffering  from  that situation  as well as from artificial  delays  in
extension of their student authorizations and other essential papers.
     My  wife  and my  mother  became suicidal,  nervous and  suffering from
depression.
     I never received any answer to my letter to the Minister of Immigration
(Nov. 1-6 2000) and to Immigration Complain Board (Nov. 30).

     4.  In spite of persecutions we have contributed to Canadian society as
much as we could. We had no conflicts in civil life. We
     worked. We have accommodated in spite of artificial obstacles -  thanks
to ordinary Canadians. Even in Federal Immigration some
     people  tried to compensate  the damage, done to us  by others. I  have
participated in tenth of musical festivals and events. My wife is
     a hard  worker.  Our  children  are recognized  talented  musician  and
ballerina (<Doc. 27). In spite of the hardship our family did not
     break.  We love each other and stick  to  each other. Isn't it would be
better for Immigration to concentrate on other things instead of
     persecute such a family as us? We hope that this unacceptable situation
will find a human solution.


     Yours truly,
     Lev GUNIN
     December 8 2000 (Montreal, Quebec)



     - DOCUMENT NUMBER FOUR-B -
     From        Lev        GUNIN       Full       immigration        story:
{www.total.net/~leog/Righs/LevGunin/indexX.htm}
     former refugee claimant
     December 02 - 2000


     1. Let's get it straight: the source of my (my family's)  problems were
my human rights' activism, and my non-trivial
     historical/philosophical attitude. I am a  former  Soviet dissident. My
conflict with the authorities (KGB involvement form the beginning)
     started in 1991, when I was  a grade 9 secondary school student.  Since
1978 the communist authorities instead of imprisoning and
     officially sanctioning some  dissidents began to  use  the non-official
persecutions: batteries, threats, secretly initiated by KGB troubles
     at  work,  etc. They also  started to  use  some  "volunteers" (non-KGB
officers) for coordinating and planning assaults on dissidents. By
     then  they  found  such  a  coordinator   for  me:  my  relative  -  my
grandmother's (from my mother's side) nephew's daughter. The
     authorities were  planning  administrative  difficulties for  me  at my
work, penetrated and disconnected from time to time my telephone
     line,  perlustrated  and confiscated my  correspondence, and stalled my
professional career. And she orchestrated strange relations
     towards me in my wife's  family, lashed my neighbors against me, spread
dirty rumors about me among my friends. She used my
     close friends like M.K. or my girlfriends (before my marriage) to do as
much damage to me as possible. She coordinated an assault
     on me  in February 1979,  when I was  wildly beaten and  spend  several
weeks in hospital.

     2.  In Israel she contacted my wife - and  took  advantage of my wife's
sincerity, openness and good soul. She started to manipulate
     her in damaging  my life  direction. My  wife  did not believe anything
that I told her about my relative. She did everything my relative has
     suggested. There were whispers that  my relative was  an  informant for
Israeli authorities. In Montreal my wife continued to be
     completely under  my relatives' control.  In  spite of my protests  she
turned with our refugee claim to my relative's lawyer, M-e Le Brune,
     and took us  all -  my mother included  - to  her medical doctor,  Mrs.
Wanda BRZEZINSKA, Immigration M.D. I could do nothing -
     because did not want to break my family.

     3.    My   relative's   closest    friend    and   M-e    Le    BRUNE's
secretary-translator,  Mrs.  Eleonor  BRODER, Israeli citizen,  did all  she
could to
     sabotage our refugee case.  You can read more details on Internet  (see
the address at the top of the page). (Or in my file handed
     over to Mrs. Mancini a couple of years ago).  Mrs. BRODER was obviously
in contact with the IRB commissioners, and partially the
     refusal of our refugee claim was besed on what Mrs. BRODER did.

     4. Mrs. Brzezinska started to play games  with  our medical data  since
our first visit to her back in 1994. She made in 1994 a
     devastative for my mom rapport to Immigration about my mother's health,
and also did everything to cause speculations that my wife
     and me might be infected  by TB. Reporting to  Immigration,  she in the
same time used to say nothing to my mother, my wife, and me.
     If - for example  - she  reported  to Immigration that my mother  has a
grave kidney problem, she said nothing to my mom and never
     sent  her to any  urologist,  never  prescribed her any medication  for
kidney stabilization. She was afraid that a specialist could reject
     her  insinuations. The same applies for Mrs. Brzezinska's  insinuations
about my mother's cardiac problems. When she sent me to do
     a  x-ray  for  Immigration, she  used  to send  an  additional  note to
radiologist like "check the recent pulmonary infiltrate". No infiltrate was
     found but in response  to  Mrs.  Brzezinska's  note  the answer was "no
recent infiltrate". And it was double meaning. One could ask:
     then  what about non-recent  infiltrate? In 1999  Mrs. Brzezinska  made
another false report to Immigration against my mother, and
     me. This  will  help you to understand better  the mechanism behind the
last outraged assault on us by the Federal Immigration. One
     will  ask: "Why  then you did not quit  Brzezinska and went to  another
physician?" Yes, I knew that she was not only a medical
     provocateur but also an informant for Immigration. When I used to come,
she spoke with me for 30-40 minutes not about my health
     but about my  affairs.  And I  have used  her for  sending  through her
misinformation for some people at Immigration, who wanted to do
     damage me and my situation.

     5. Political forces from two countries are behind all these events: the
forces of Lukashenko's and Israeli regimes. I believe that there
     about 5-6 "curators" around  me - such as my relative, Mrs. Broder, and
Mrs. Brzezinska, with somebody like their supervisor at a high
     position  in local society (I even  guess who is that). And the rest is
self-organizing by the destructivism of Canadian Immigration itself.

     6.  From  the  mid-1970-s   governments  started   instead  of  putting
dissidents into prisons and concentration camps to practice other
     methods:  devastation  of  victim's  financial  and  social  situation,
ostracism and isolation, batteries, dirty rumors, administrative pressure
     through ordinary governmental  institutions (tax agency, telecom, post,
etc.). They also practicing deportation and persecutions of
     their    victims   by   other    governments'   hands,   assassination,
disappearances, and short arrests with police brutality, insinuated criminal
     cases.  That's why the old classical model of a prisoner  of conscience
as a detained person and humanitarian help to get him out of a
     prison  does  not  works for approximately  80%  of victims. The modern
classical "prisoner of conscience" in many cases is a person
     without  any  passport,  a  refugee claimant or a  refugee  without any
status. Thousands and thousands not political but other
     dissidents  are persecuted  because  of their  dispute  with employers,
landlords, corporative world, schools, police, vendors, etc. More
     and  more often  contrived medical diagnosis and falsified medical data
are used against them. As a rule, it is always very difficult to
     prove something, so delicately everything made up.  My  case is one  of
unique cases when evidences are so manifestly. It is a rare
     opportunity to show what is really going on in the modern world.

     7. If  people like me  will  not  be defended - then  comes  mayhem and
dictatorship. Legislation to give access to personal medical files
     to  all governmental  institutions and even (!) employers have  already
been prepared in a number of countries, including Canadian
     province Ontario. Where it leads you could see in my files.

     Yours truly,
     Lev GUNIN

        OTHER PUBLICATIONS

     http://www.interlog.com/~syedma/dstand/leo201127.html
     http://www.interlog.com/~syedma/dstand/leo_updte02.html
     http://www.amin.org/update/censor.htm
     http://www.singer.ca/forum/imm/messages/821.html
     http://www.kuero4/justice/gun.html




        UPDATE IN FAMILY GUNIN SITUATION
     UPDATE IN FAMILY GUNIN PERSECUTIONS
     Manipulation of medical data  for political persecutions is the end  of
the civilized society
     - December 2000 -


        C O N T E N T
     1. List of documents
     2. Complaint on Immigration actions and decisions
     3. Complaint against refusal to allow medical examinations.
     4. Disagreement with  the decision of  Imm.Med.Serv. from  November 23,
2000.
     5. Copy of a complaint made to Montreal Chest Institute.
     6. Short descriptions of events - end of 1999 - beginning of 2000
     7. Lev GUNIN - "The Source Of Our Problems"
     8. Wider detailed  description  of events before December (Sept. - Nov.
2000)
     9. Resume of the visit to MCI December 4 2000.
     10. The whole immigration story
     11. Other  English publications on Internet about persecution of family
GUNIN
     To Human Rights Organizations
     (AI, HRW, UNHRC, etc.)

     December, 2000. Montreal, QUEBEC

     - Introductory Document -


     From       Lev        GUNIN        Full        immigration       story:
{www.total.net/~leog/Righs/LevGunin/indexX.htm}
     former refugee claimant
     (tel. 514-49-1294) December 2 2000

     Introductory Note
     1.  Because violations and  injustice are so  outraged and unbelievable
that it is difficult to speak
     about  them  without  emotions,  I  decided  not  to  write  a  special
description of events. Instead I
     am  handing  you  over  a number  of  documents, which  will  speak for
themselves.
     2.  Below I am listing  these documents  with comments and explanations
about each.
     Manipulation and  falsification of  medical data is  the most dangerous
and tremendous violation
     of human rights. Most letters from Immigration were anonymous, but only
few marked here on
     that regard as examples.

     Document 1:
     Complaint on Immigration actions and decisions submitted to Immigration
Complain Board
     (like  attempts  to  cause damage  to  victim's  heath).  Theoretically
falsification and blatant
     manipulation  of medical  data  can lead to a  forcible treatment  from
diseases, which one do not
     have (it could be lethal).
     Document 2:
     Complaint  against  refusal  to  allow  all  my family  members medical
examinations.
     Document 3:
     My disagreement with  the decision of Imm.Med.Serv.  from  November 23,
2000.
     Document 4-a:
     A  shortened  description  of events, which  manifested abuse of power,
ungrounded secrecy,
     misconduct and criminal manipulation of medical data. Document 4-b is a
supplementary
     description  about  the source  of  my  problems.  It  is  crucial  for
understanding the mechanism
     behind the persecutions.
     Document 5:
     Fifth is a copy of a complaint made to Montreal Chest Institute.
     Document 6:
     A  wider description of  events,  with  more astonishing  and  outraged
details. This document is
     not        enclosed        but       available       on       Internet:
{www.interlog.com/~syedma/dstand/leo201127.html}
     Document 7a, 7b, 7c, 7d:
     M-me  Roy's  rulings:  illegal  intervention  into medical  matters  by
non-medic, violation of the
     procedural requirements of  the  marriage interview  stage, prejudicial
ruling of IMS before my
     mother's medical exams for the landed immigrant status.
     Document 8:
     Complaint to Immigration about extension's of  employment authorization
sabotage from May
     15 2000.
     Document 9:
     Resume of my visit to MCI December 4 2000.
     Document 10-a
     The anonymous letter from MCI mentioned in Documents 1, 3, 4, 5, and 6.
Document 10-b:
     another  letter (one page)  demanding a donation to  the Royal Victoria
Hospital was included in
     the same envelope as the "TB letter".
     Document 11
     An order-receipt (payment)  to  pay  for  the blood test  for syphilis,
which was never done.
     Another document  (Document 12)  shows  that  dr. Giannalis  uses  this
laboratory to evaluate
     test samples, taken at his office. The  blood test for syphilis was not
required by Immigration in
     my case. It was also mentioned that a patient must only appear for this
test in the CDL
     Laboratories,  in  other words  samples  taken outside CDL Lab  are not
admitting for evaluation
     for syphilis.
     Document 12
     Strum creatinine test's form from CDL  Lab form for my mother. The test
was ordered by dr.
     Giannakis on Immigration's request and the result was: in norm.
     Document 13-a
     Front page of  the  IMS  ruling from November 23  letter  (received  on
November 28).
     Corresponds to  Document  3. Also was mentioned in  Documents  1, 4, 6.
Document 13-b is the
     text  of  the internal  part of  the same  ruling,  addressing  to  dr.
Giannakis.
     Document 14-a
     Ruling from IMS to my mother,  Elisabetha Epstein from January 17 2000.
This document is
     anonymous, no names, telephone  numbers. Document 14-b is  the  text of
the internal part of
     the same ruling, addressing to dr. Giannakis.
     Document 15-a
     Ruling from  IMS to my  mother, Elisabetha  Epstein  from June 30 2000.
This document is
     anonymous, no names, telephone numbers.  Document  15-b is  the text of
the internal part of
     the same ruling, addressing to dr. Giannakis.
     Document 15 plus
     September 2000 - letter from IMS ordering another urine test and then a
visit to an urologist.
     Document 16
     An  offensive  letter from my  mother's  new immigration  officer  from
September 18 2000.
     Document 17
     My mother's, Elisabetha  Epstein,  response (September  20 2000)  to an
offensive letter from
     Immigration (see Document 16).
     Document 18
     Copy of the positive response to our humanitarian appeal
     Document 19
     An order from  January 11 2000 to my wife, Alla, to undergo the medical
examination. Only my
     wife's  name mentioned  in  this  letter.  This letter is  a proof that
refusing to include all family
     members Immigration stalling the completion of our file almost one year
now.
     Document 20
     An order from October  26 2000 to me and  my daughter Marta  to undergo
medical
     examination.  Was  submitted   in  contradiction   with  the   previous
Immigration's assurance that
     only my wife has to undergo medical examination.
     Document 21-a
     X-ray  result from Le Centre Radiologique Clarke from November 14 2000,
which tremendously
     contradict the Immigration's x-ray from November 01 2000 evaluation. In
response to TB
     double-check request (see Document 21-b) it said "NIL ACTIVE". The film
was evaluated by 3
     medical doctors, which came  to the same "nil active" conclusion. I was
seen and evaluated by
     2  medical  doctors  since  October  29,  who  found the  TB  suspicion
ridiculous.
     Document 22
     X-ray result  from  November  22 1994 from the Centre Hospitalier Reddy
Memorial. On request
     of W. Brzezinska, M.D. if  there is recent pulmonary infiltrate it said
"no recent pulmonary
     infiltrate shown".
     Document 23
     Mr. Z. JAST's  certificate  for Immigration  in  relation to  the x-ray
dispute.
     Document 24
     Internet-links   to   two   publications,   which    might   accelerate
persecutions.
     Document 25-a,b
     IMS final decision in my mother's case from Dec. 5 2000.
     Document 26
     Document 27
     List  of  "civil"  events.  Relates to  our  will to contribute to  the
society.
     Lev GUNIN December 2 2000 Montreal




        COPY - DOCUMENT NUMBER ONE -
     To Immigration's Canada Complaint Board
     (faxes: (780) 632-8101 (514) 283-8237) November 30 2000
     From Lev GUNIN (514-499-1294)

     This is the complaint on actions and decisions, which my advisers and I
found inadmissible, like
     attempts to  cause  damage to my  mother's and my heath.  Theoretically
falsification and blatant
     manipulation of  medical  data can  lead to  a forcible  treatment from
diseases, which one do not
     have (it could be lethal).
     .
     I submit  you 5 documents. The First is this one. Second is a complaint
against refusal to allow
     all my family members medical examinations half a year ago. Third is my
disagreement with the
     decision of Immigration  Health Services from November 23, 2000. Fourth
is a shortened
     description  of events,  which manifested  abuse  of  power, ungrounded
secrecy, misconduct and
     criminal manipulation of medical  data.  Fifth is a copy of a complaint
made to Montreal Chest
     Institute.  Sixth  is  a   wider  description  of  events,  with   more
astonishing and outraged details.
     However, because  of the length of the Sixth document its submission by
fax could be found
     offensive, so, please, tell me where to send it by post or e-mail.

     I would like to know:
     A)  Who  made  all  mentioned in six documents unjust decisions (names,
position, what their role
     in my file).
     B) On what ground (law, paragraph, circumstances).
     C)  Who made a decision,  based on a single  x-ray: to  consider  me  a
potential TB carrier and
     submitted  it  not to Mr. Giannakis,  M.D.  but to  the Royal  Victoria
Hospital, depriving me and
     doctor  Giannakis  of a  minimal  choice to choose where  to  turn  for
further evaluation. Is the MCI
     radiology unit a part of IMS (ImmMedSrv)?
     D)  If the x-ray film (made at MCI)  could be obtained for copying.  My
legal advisers and me - we
     want to ask  you to show it to us at 1010 St Antoine, Montreal. We want
to check:
     E) If a)  there is  any technical defect or underwear shadow, which was
offensively interpreted
     as  "TB" b)  this  x-ray matches my  body constitution c) an  obviously
normal result was blatantly
     interpreted  as  "abnormal". We would like to be  given a permission to
take this film or its copy to
     medical specialists to determine it.
     F) How  all  contradictions,  deceptions,  violations can  be explained
(each event).
     G)  Examples: a) Half  a year ago IMS  officials refused  to  submit us
ruling and forms for medical
     examination for all family members assuring us that only my wife has to
go through them. Now
     in  contradiction with what  was  said before they ordered  my  younger
daughter and me (now
     omitting my older daughter) to do examinations. B) Why my mother's file
was illegally attached
     to mine. c)  How could so many ungrounded medical tests be ruled for my
mother, keeping her
     more then one year (!) in limbo, etc.
     H) How all such decisions might be appealed?
     I) Has my mother and me same IMS agents or agents of the same unit? Who
are supervisors
     of  all agents, attached to our  files  (including Immigration  Medical
Services - IMS).
     J) How to reach them?
     K) If Immigration's agents (IMS included) are subjects of Criminal Code
- or they are
     completely uncontrolled and impunitive.
     L) If they are not (impunitive) what is the way to complain about
     1.  Deliberate  damage  of  my  (my family's)  financial,  social,  and
psychological situation.
     2. Criminal manipulation of the medical data
     M) How could  I  know if W. Brzezinska's M.D.  rapport with a "concern"
about my health
     presents not only in my mother's but in my file as well?
     N) Why my file is proceeding not  on Montreal -  as  normally - but  in
Ottawa?

     I must  warn you  that I will  contact police or RCMP in  case  of  any
further anonymous calls
     ("private  call"  indication)  from Immigration and  will disregard any
letters, until they will not be
     signed and carry  the  name and phone  number  of  the  person  who  is
responsible for the
     decision. All  anonymous telephone calls, which accuse me of concealing
a number of
     infectious diseases, must be stopped. Anonymous letters  from hospitals
on behalf of
     Immigration with  same  insinuations  are unacceptable as  well. I have
also received a receipt for
     a blood test for syphilis, which I never did, from a Lab, where I never
went. I was also called by
     two other  laboratories, which pretend that I did tests for  infectious
diseases, and this is not
     true. All such provocation must be stopped immediately!
     .
     All  5  (or 6) documents must  be  evaluated to consider and  answer my
complaint. Please,
     answer all  questions,  which arise  from the documents. I  ask you  to
respond to this complaint in
     writing.  However,  another solution  is  just to  consider my  case as
"finished" with no further
     demands. Will appreciate your cooperation.


     Yours,
     Lev GUNIN

     November 30 2000
     Chronology in GUNINS' case

     November 1994 -
     refugee claim
     March 1997 -
     refugee claim rejected.

     (In the negative decision our refugee
     claim description was severely
     distorted; document includes such
     direct and indirect statements as a)
     nothing bad could happen in such a
     beautiful country like Israel, b) people
     who were taken to Israel for
     Sochnut's expense are property of
     Israel, c) people who refused to
     change their believes and opinions
     are guilty on persecutions themselves
     because provoked them c) no
     minimum of confidence). January
     1998
     - Federal Court closing our case on a
     ridiculous ground of Immigration's "no
     minimal confidence" ruling.
     January 2000
     - positive decision in response to our
     humanitarian appeal.
     March 2000 -
     an interview lead to the Certificat de
     selectione du Quebec issuing by
     Quebec's Immigration
     March 2000 -
     bureaucratic humiliation and blatant
     manipulation of medical data by
     Federal Immigration starts to torpid
     the completion of the case



     Chronology in

     Elisabetha GUNIN (Epstein's)
     case:.1994 -
     refugee claim + Wanda Brzezinska,
     M.D. makes a false report (see Doc.
     4b, 7a, 7b).
     March 1997 -
     refugee claim rejected.
     January 1998
     - Federal Court closing our case on a
     ridiculous ground of Immigration's "no
     minimal confidence" ruling.
     November 1998 -
     marriages a Canadian citizen
     November 22 1999 -
     my mother's marriage interview.
     Nov. 23, Madame Helene ROY
     replaces the initiative negative
     decision, based on "medical
     concerns" (dr. Brzezinska's rapport),
     by a positive one.
     January 2000 - Certificat de
     selectione du Quebec was issued for
     my mother.
     January 2000, a ruling from IMS
     ordering my mother additional tests:
     strum creatinine (blood test) and
     echocardiogram.
     June 30, 2000 - IMS ridiculous
     demand of a resume from "the last
     visit to cardiologist".
     July 27 2000
     - rapport of Dr. Gordon Creenstein
     (anatomy, not pathology) was
     submitted to Immigration.
     September 2000 -
     another letter from IMS ordering
     another urine test and then a visit to
     an urologist.
     September 19 2000 -
     offensive letter from Immigration
     officer. December 2000 -
     IMS final negative decision confirming
     the illegal prejudicial decision from
     Nov. 99.


     - DOCUMENT NUMBER TWO -
     To Immigration's Canada Complaint Board
     (faxes: (780) 632-8101 (514) 283-8237)
     From Lev GUNIN (514-499-1294)

        A COPY OF DOCUMENT SUBMITTED TO IMMIGRATION
     ON MAY 15 2000

     By this letter we ask Immigration's agent assigned to my file to make a
special ruling to order medical examinations for all members
     of our family, not only for  Alla GUNIN,  my wife. As we know from  our
legal advisers, this procedure is required for all family members
     for the landed  immigrant's status. If you insist that only my wife has
to do the medical examination, please, send us a written warrant.
     We have a well-grounded suspicion that somebody might  use the delay in
ordering the medical examination for all members of our
     family  for artificial  sabotage  of issuing us  the landed immigrant's
status. We will appreciate your cooperation.

        YOURS TRULY
     Lev GUNIN
     in name of family GUNIN

     The 15 of May 2000
     COPY - DOCUMENT NUMBER THREE -
     To Immigration's Complaints Board
     (faxes: (780) 632-8101 (514) 283-8237) December 1 2000
     From Lev GUNIN (514-499-1294)

     I   disagree  with   the  Immigration  Medical  Services  decision  "ev
7001-850497Z" (with date mentioned: November 23, 2000) from
     Ottawa, received by me  on November 29,  2000 (anonymous  - no name  or
signature). The goal of this ruling is not to establish the
     medical truth but to put a hardship on my family (and me).
     My arguments.
     (See the decision's  text -  as it was red  to me by dr. Giannakis - in
Document N4: on the bottom)
     1. The decision ruled that Mr. Giannakis's respond should  be submitted
before November 30, 2000. Why then the letter arrived only
     on November  29? Does it  mean that the date in the letter -  "November
23" - was incorrect? Or the letter has not been sent in 2-3 days? Or - if it
is known that a letter from  Ottawa to Montreal goes 5-6 days  - why  then I
was not given more time? I ask you to submit me an explanation what November
30 means and why not December 10 or January 15? I want to know how the agent
justified  that  particular  date.  Was  that  small  misconduct  planned in
advance?
     2. The  suggestion that somebody else went and did the x-ray instead of
me was another serious assault. That suggestion was made in ignorance of the
fact that on Clark Lab's official (original!) paper IMS (Immigration Medical
Service) officer could see my name, date of birth, telephone number, name of
the ordering physician, and the number of my medical card (which - everybody
knows  -  has my  photo  on it).  Besides,  it  mentioned  the "MILD  PECTUS
EXCAVATUM",  a cosmetic defect, which  I  have  since birth.  Besides, it is
known that the film itself has a negative image of the whole ID data! Then -
this ungrounded abuse was based on  nothing and went far beyond  any medical
or even legal matter.
     3.  The demand to  send an original film from the  November 14 x-ray in
the light of two above disputed demands might be ungrounded. This x-ray film
was already seen by 3 medical doctors: the radiologist at the Clark Lab, dr.
Jast (who referred me and evaluated the film), and dr. Giannakis. All  three
came to  a  conclusion  that  there  is  NOTHING  abnormal, not  a slightest
possibility.
     Both  dr. Jast and Giannakis also examined me. The  official conclusion
is NIL ACTIVE. Besides, it  was informally evaluated  by a chest specialist:
with the  same  conclusion.  What  else  the  IMS  agent  needs?  I  have  a
well-grounded concern that  1)  he/she will find a  black spot  even on  the
whitest  paper - because he/she is determined  to;  and 2) after he/she will
find "a  black spot" the film will  vanish, but  not the IMS's "evaluation".
Immigration   pretended  already  many  times  (dates,  documents  might  be
provided) that lost our applications, medical data, etc.
     4.  It was  an abuse to  mention  that  "After  overview  if  necessary
applicant may  have  to  be  referred  to the chest  specialist."  It  is  a
prejudgment and prejudice. "...if necessary", "may" are just a form. It is a
very clear  message that  he/she will not let me alone!  Why to speak  about
next medical procedure before seeing the x-ray?

     Lev GUNIN Dec. 01 2000

     Copy - DOCUMENT NUMBER FIVE -

     From Lev GUNIN ( 514-499-1294)
     Document 5
     LETTER TO THE MONTREAL CHEST INSTITUTE - A Copy -

     (The letter was submitted on  November  09 in respond  to an  anonymous
letter from the Montreal Chest Institute received on November 6  2000; below
you can find a modified version (November 12-14), which was submitted to the
same destination on November 15).
     .
     Lev GUNIN
     address
     telephone
     From  Lev GUNIN  to anonymous person, author of the letter (the copy of
the letter is enclosed).
     Montreal Chest Institute
     3666 St-Urbain
     Montreal, QUEBEC H2X 2P4

     Sir or Lady! Please, forward this letter to an appropriate  Immigration
department, which you mentioned on page 1 of your letter.

     First of all, any  suggestions that I could be infected by tuberculosis
were ridiculous.  I had some other suggestions, but later a medical doctor I
spoke to - as well as  my legal advisers -  told me  that the only answer of
what happened is that  Immigration  might  just  make  a false report  on my
x-ray. Besides,  a x-ray could not determine  whether  or  not  any  of such
shadow means tuberculosis, or simply any kind of pneumonia, bronchitis, or a
combination (see medical books). Any conclusions based on only one x-ray are
ridiculous,  partial, and prejudicial.  In modern time -  when there  are so
many flu infections accompanied by  pneumonic consequences (side  effects) -
such conclusions are  a complete  nonsense. It is obvious that your decision
to  attach  me to the Infectious  Disease Unit  (IDU) before you have a  100
percent proof  of  any  tuberculosis infection  and initiate an  appropriate
legal procedure  was a drastic misconduct. The only admissible way to handle
the situation was (before sending me to the Infectious Disease Unit)
     1) to request a second opinion in existing x-ray
     2) to send me a letter for my physician for another x-ray.

     On  November 14  I did another x-ray. It revealed that there  is no any
suspicious shadow,  no  abnormalities  -  and (as my medical advisers  told)
could  not be 2  weeks before, especially tuberculosis-like shadows.  Was my
x-ray  photo  (a negative) replaced by  somebody else's  or IMS (Immigration
Medical Services) just falsified the reading of my x-rays, - I do not  know.
That all is a subject of a criminal investigation.

     Because  I  am depressed,  I  did not  notice that the  Montreal  Chest
Institute (MCI) belongs to Royal Victoria Hospital,  an  institution  I  had
several  formal  conflicts with. Somebody from the hospital's administration
used to  submit  me  an  offensive number  of  requests for  donation to the
hospital  even  after I  have sent a  note that  by then was on welfare. The
hospital's administration also did an  attempt  to extort  money from me for
services, which were  covered by  Medicare. In that hospital I heard several
times that people  like  me are "illegal in Canada and should not  be  given
medical help "for the cost of Canadians". Then  I was  treated by negligence
at  the emergency room, then -  it  was  a  medical misconduct  over my CSST
claim.  Dr. Evenson's M.D. (Royal Victoria) secretary played games with  me,
actually denying  an appointment from  May till November  2000. A  number of
legal and medical violations used to take place there. And in all such minor
incidents immigration matters or even Immigration itself  were involved. One
of immigration specialists advised me not to  turn to Royal Victoria because
that hospital is "enormously influenced by Immigration".

     The  fact that a  page with  a  request for  a donation  to  the  Royal
Victoria Hospital was included into your letter was another outraged abuse.

     Eventually it is possible that doctor Giannakis had sent  me  for x-ray
not  to "La Cite" - as my mom and my wife, - or  another medical institution
but to Montreal  Chest Institute because he received an order (not a request
but an order, which  he could not disobey as an Immigration  representative)
from Immigration to do so.

     By this letter I declare that I am considering your way of handling the
situation dangerously offensive and depriving me of my constitutional rights
because of the above mentioned as well as the next reasons:

     FIRST, I will  DISREGARD any  anonymous letters like  your present  one
until a letter from you would be signed, addressed from a  real  person with
his/her clear name and telephone number.

     SECOND, you have  no legal  rights to treat  me as a contagious carrier
until an undeniable medical proof is established.

     THIRD, by sending me to the IDU you may expose me to contacts with real
infected carriers.

     FOURTH,  you  are  not  a  police, Immigration, secret  police or death
squads to a) act secretly-anonymously refusing to sign your letter,
     b) to write  me  anything like "by  Immigration law,  you are requested
(...)". Since you are not immigration layers  or  Immigration officials, you
are  forbidden  to judge in a  case like mine what Immigration law requires.
Such a statement  in a case like mine must be submitted only  directly  from
Immigration. If you are part  of Immigration (officially)  - then my  rights
were violated  when I wasn't informed  about that  before doing the x-ray at
your unit.

     FIFTH, my legal  advisors,  and me,  we are confident that you  have no
legal  rights to  deprive me of choosing between  medical  institutions  for
medical tests  or  evaluation.  You can  not  bring  me to  do a test or  an
evaluation  exclusively in your institution by a  forceful order. This  will
violate my basic human rigDocument 5hts. Even KGB had  no official rights to
oblige anybody who was not an imprisoned suspect or convinced criminal to do
a medical evaluation without some sort of choice.

     SIXTH,  I  would ask Immigration  to allow me  do another  x-ray before
doing anything else.

     SEVENTH,  evaluating  my case,  some human rights activists think  that
somebody at  Immigration is so  furious, so angry about me and that  such an
outraged  misconduct  was  demonstrated  in  my  case  that  Immigration  is
eventually ready to do any damage to my health through blood, e-ray tests or
sadistic bureaucratic humiliations.

     EIGHTH, I  think that the  most realistic  explanations of an  eventual
abnormality, which could be seen on the x-ray picture, were:
     1) eventual shadow from the underwear, which I did not  remove  from on
beneath of the hospital robe, and the robe itself, which I've putted on in a
wrong way
     2) a dust spot or another kind of essence on the hospital robe
     3) traces of somehow inhaled gas different from air
     4) reading of  a normal  x-ray (with no abnormalities) was deliberately
falsified by IMS

     NINTH,  before   doing  the  e-ray  I  received  a  strange  call  from
Immigration, through which I was accused of refusing a "medical treatment".

     TENTH, your medical  ethics  should not allow you to send me to the IDU
before  making  your   own  medical  conclusions  (decision)  based  not  on
Immigration's rapport but of your own evaluation of my x-ray test result.

     ELEVENTH, my legal advisors have told me that I have  rights to ask for
a  possibility  to  discuss  my  x-ray  result  with  any  of  your  medical
institution specialists dedicated to such evaluations before going  further.
It is you (on behalf of Immigration or not -  it is does not matter) who are
sending me to Infectious Disease Unit. Because you are sending me  to such a
unit, you  can not deny me  such a discussion. I would like to see the x-ray
original, which was made in your institution on November  1 2000 -  and also
show Document
     5it to my medical advisors.

     TWELVETH, I prefer not to go through further  tests or  evaluations  in
immigration  matters  (for  medical  purposes  -  it's  different)  at  your
institution.

     Yours truly,
     Lev GUNIN
     November 2000 Montreal

     - Document Number Nine -

     RESUME of my visit to Montreal Chest Institute on December 2 2000

     OBJECT Of the Visit:
     1) to  receive  an  official result  (medical resume-evaluation) of  my
x-ray test done on November 1 2000
     2) find out where is the original film and try to obtain it  for making
a copy

        REASONS:
     November 23  2000. I have managed to find out who sent me the anonymous
letter (described in Documents 5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6) from
     Montreal  Chest  Institute (MCI). It  was  M-me  Lucy Gefroy (Jefroi or
Joyfroid?). According  to the  same sources:  she's never seen that x-ray. I
left  her my message  on  849-5211  (ex  2166).  She called me  at 2.15 p.m.
anonymously ("private  call" indication)  - and  asked me  what  I want. She
confessed that she  is M-me Lucy  only when  I  told her that recognized her
voice  comparing it to her answering machine message. That  only  could tell
about her insincerity and guilt. I spoke with her in French, but when I  did
not know some medical terminology in French, and used English, she pretended
that  does  not  speak English at  all. However,  when I switched  to French
again, she started to speak bad English,  which I  could  not understand. It
was  difficult  to get along with her, but finally I convinced  her to speak
French again - and asked her a couple of questions.
     Here they are:
     - Did you see the x-ray?
     - Yes, I did.
     - What  kind of a shadow did you see,  mild? bright? what its form?  On
the right or left side?
     - I can not tell you.
     - Where is this x-ray film now?
     - I can not tell you.
     - Is it at MCI?
     - Immigration took it from us, and, I think, it was lost.
     - What do you mean - lost?
     - Vanished somewhere at Immigration.
     - Can I obtain the result?
     - Listen, your case here is  closed.  You don't have to  come here. Not
any more. We disabled our previous letter's order. Bye.
     She disconnected.

     RESULTS of the visit.
     At MCI's  medical archive employers did not find any  records about  my
x-ray in the computer. They told me that a mistake might
     occur -  because  if  even I  did  the x-ray for Immigration,  its data
(result, date, etc.) since November 1 had to be entered into the
     registry.

     Before  I could  enter room number  28 a  small blond man appeared  and
approached me as in espionage novels (how could he
     react so  quickly, who warned him during my descending from the  second
to  the  first  floor?) "You w