Ocenite etot tekst:



     Vadim Kirpichev (vkirpichev@mtu-net.ru)
     GOD DOES NOT EXIST ( Scientific Proof)
      Vadim Kirpichev, 2003

     Summary

     Substitution  of  atheistic  rhetoric  by a  formal  proof.  A  trivial
conclusion of Gods nonexistence is proved on the basis of Amorology (science
exploring love)  with the help of  the equation of love. A  positive outline
for future  activities for Russians is presented. Transfer from Noosphere to
Noouniverse.  Absolute  materialism  as  intellectual   Freudism,  dialectic
materialism and Russian cosmism integrator.

     Key words: Love, Happiness, God, Love equation.

     Abstract
     Neo-Freudiam  model of  human psyche serves as a basis  for a proof  of
Gods nonexistence. This model in  its turn serves as  the basis of a science
studying  love  -  Amorology. An  equation  of  love  produces  quantitative
results. Definition  of  God is given with the help of a new  notion - sartu
(striving for happiness).

     God is defined through sartu and existence. Universalism of the formula
of  God  leads to considering religious theory  and  practice  as arrived to
total expenditure, while  the  principle of non-multiplying of entities - to
complete exclusion of the very existence of God.

     Sketch development  of  dialectic materialism  theory  and  existential
focus for future  humankind. Negation of  the necessity to choose between  a
fairy tale and negative world outlook.

     Scientific and moral proof of nonexistence of an  absolute monotheistic
God beyond Nature.

     Essay

     "How happy is the Man
     Who grasped the causes
     Of all existing things"
     Vergilius, Georgics

     Contents:
     1. Necessity of a proof. Doubt as a crumbling foundation of Faith.
     2. Scheme of the proof.
     3. The proof.
     3.1. Basic Amorology.
     3.2. Equation of Love.
     3.3. Equation of God.
     3.4. Implementing the Occams Razor.
     3.5. God does not exist.
     4. Job for the Creator.
     5. Dostoyevskys fork. Is sincere faith possible? Godlike Humanity.
     6. An Absolute Testament.
     6.1. Faith in Aimer. Outline.
     6.2. An Absolute Commandment.

     Comparison, symbol -
     Everything lasts but a minute.
     Aims at Infinity
     Through the attainment,
     Through the atonement
     In final Truth.
     Eternal femininity
     Attracts us to it.
     I.Goethe. Faustus


     1. Necessity of a proof. Doubt as a crumbling foundation of Faith.

     In a globalized world a notion of God turns dangerous. World became too
crowded, and traditional religions presume that there are values higher than
human life. Are there? Earth is too small for religious fanatics.
     Faith is  fed by doubt. People believe  things which  are impossible to
check and prove conclusively.
     In  monotheistic tradition the existence of God never was evident. Thus
five proofs of Gods  existence by Aquinas and  a whole multitude  of similar
attempts by other theologians and philosophers. Thomas Fidel stated that the
existence of God is not evident for the mind but can be proved. We shall try
to  prove the  contrary -  that nonexistence  of God  is evident and  can be
proved.


     2. Scheme of the proof.

     We shall build the proof by  analogy to the known proof of nonexistence
of the heat-agent and ether.
     A certain model of existing reality is built. An assertion is made that
such a model scientifically explains all known facts.
     With the help of Occams Razor all extra entities are  cut  off. In this
manner the kinetic theory of heat made redundant the idea of the heat-agent,
and the theory of relativity - that of ether.


     3. The proof.
     3.1. Basic Amorology.

     No one can call
     Love by its true name.
     Silently blows this wind
     Staying dumb and invisible.
     Robert Burns



       What  is  Love?  Is it possible  that throughout five thousand  years
starting from  the first texts  of  the period Uruk III-Djemdet-Nasr none of
the great scholars managed to  get at the core of the matter? Incredible. It
should be  evident in the  brilliant light of Truth which would  brighten up
our petty minds as soon as we wipe the dust of ages from ancient volumes and
imbibe from the deepest well of wisdom - and we shall praise the wise men of
yore and scorn our own shallowness.
     To augment  this brilliance well take only a liberty to pair the  great
thinkers.  Let  us  introduce  a tint  of competitiveness to  dramatize  the
situation and watch the  rounds  between them  trying to judge the weight of
whose arguments is the most conclusive.

     Let us sit closer to the ropes.



     "To love deeply is to forget oneself"
     Jean-Jacques Rousseau

     "True essence  of love is in ... finding your  true  self and to master
oneself"
     H.Hegel



     "Love turns us blind".
     Lopez de Vega

     "Love is not blind for an advanced person"
     N.V.Shelgunov


     "To love is to find ones happiness in the happiness of the other"
     G. Leibnitz

     "To love is to know that a person wishes and does to you only well"
     P.A.Pavlenko


     "Love is the most curious and forgivable of all human weaknesses"
     Charles Dickens

     "Which  wedge, which hammer  can  be  compared to  the  force  of love?
Nothing can withstand its power"
     Henry Thoreau



     "Deep love follows with necessity deep mind"
     I.A.Goncharov

     "Love often takes the mind away from the one who has it..."
     Denis Diderot


     "Love conquers all, let us be obedient to its power"
     Vergilius

     "I dethrone love because negate its monarchial power"
     A.I.Hertzen


     "Love is the creator of everything kind, noble, strong, warm and fair"
     F.E.Dzerzhinsky

     "Only  the low, rude and dirty mind indeed  may constantly get busy its
curiosity by circling around the beauty of female body"
     G.Bruno



     "It is in loves power to change a person beyond recognition"
     Terence

     "Only love is capable to make you truly yourself"
     Plato


     It can be easily seen that each paired phrase contradicts another which
means that throughout five thousand years the greatest human minds were  not
able to produce a consistent definition of love. One  can only wonder - what
did they spend all this time on?

     So  there  is  no  retreat  -  we have  to  undertake  the toil  of the
centuries. Ten minutes will be quite enough, I presume.

     The key question  will be  - what is loves  denominator?  What  does it
correlate to or associated with? Here  wisdom of the centuries  really comes
to our help - well just cite the most representative phrases:

     "Happy in the one who is in power of love"
     I.Goethe
     "What a great happiness is to love and be loved"
     A.P.Chekhov
     "The biggest happiness in life is to be sure that you are loved"
     V.Hugo
     "The greatest happiness possible for a person - Love"
     B.Pascal

     You couldnt have missed the inseparable  satellite of love, its eternal
companion. Happiness is the main correlate of love.

     But  what is the happiness  itself?  An  emotion? Way of life? Process?
Aim?  Aspiration, as written in  the  American constitution? Plucked  string
heard in the mist? Girls laughter in the blooming garden?
     The  harder  we try to  pinpoint  it - the more  effectively it  evades
definition, inhabiting various domains.
     Eclectic entities are convenient for manipulation  but  not  for  work.
Multifarious  meanings  are shallow if considered for practical use. That is
why we include "happiness" into  a  mythological  vocabulary without  longer
doubts  and turn to  real  emotions. Where  is the source  of  striving  for
happiness? Where does  the wish  to  meet wonder around the next corner come
from?  What makes us tremble  on a  dark path in the park in anticipation of
something wonderful  and amazing? The answer is evident - our wishes, or, to
be exact, their extra quality which very rarely meets fulfillment.
     Attention!  Here  is  punktum  saliens,  the  trembling  point. Only  a
hyperwish, extra  striving of the soul  switches a halo  above  the  subject
marking proximity of happiness.
     When we yawn  and  distractedly reach for an aplle  the soul is silent,
but if  somebody  slaps our lazy hand - the forbidden fruit can pull all our
attention and become more desirable than all the  riches in the  world. Here
is  a complicated mechanism at work  in our soul which  we  shall  call by a
single word - sartu.

     Sartu is the word which explains the world of love.

     What is  truth?  An absolute lie.  What  is  sartu? Saru (striving  for
happiness) is  the process of converting the  excessive wishes (hyperwishes)
into anticipation  of emerging  world  positively oriented towards a person,
the world without dialectics and negative feedback.
     A new  word "sartu"  is necessary to  mark  the  new content of ancient
categories.
     We can  also  express  the  striving  for happiness  as looking  for  a
miracle, anticipation  of Eden, or  -  simpler -  sartu  is  a  mechanism of
turning the excessive, unreal for the moment wishes into anticipation of the
positive ego-oriented boundless  world  devoid  of  dialectics  and negative
feedback.

     Sartu is an amazing  Natures oven melting hyperwishes into anticipation
of a fairy tale. Sartu is an immortal Botticelli who paints with the help of
boiling hormones  amazing pictures which  in  their  turn  well  up  to  the
conscious level as anticipation of wonder.

     Why is it so?

     Souls strivings are myopic, linear, infinite and egoistic. The world is
wide,  multidimensional, limited and  indifferent. Sartu pictures destiny as
sunny  way to heavens  but earthly  paths are often  very narrow and uneven.
Black  and  white stripes are constantly alternating  in the  world  whereas
sartu  whereas sartu  makes  us see  it  from  under  a rainbow,  peaks  and
depressions of future weekdays cardiogram  are  considered  a  steady  rise,
filled with wonderful adventures, towards a shining mountaintop.

     Soul  is  an instrument  to  measure the  tension of  the other  worlds
magnetic fields.

     Without  sartu, the oven  melting the ore of base desires, people would
have had  only  pitiful  existence. Aspiring  to get to  the stars but  with
feeble muscles, having infinite desires but utterly lazy, wishing  to  reach
eternal life with a heavy bag of sins, to be worldwide famous while boasting
but  very  moderate talents,  having added only  a  farthing to  the  native
countrys wealth to pour all ones  money into a fat account in a Swiss bank -
what could  a  person  reach  without the  healing  power of  amazing sartu?
Without such a press capable of wielding any swords into golden ploughshares
and preparing the ground for happiness the impossible desired would have had
simply burnt out your soul.
     And now  we  are approaching love again to catch its shimmering essence
into the  net  of  sartu. There  is  soul  with  hyper-desires  and sartu  -
transcription mechanism of these desires. What is  lacking?  Just the object
to focus the celestial fire at.  God,  fame, money, family,  nation,  power,
man, woman - destiny is fanning the deck as a skillful card-sharper, you are
welcome to stake, ladies and gentlemen!

     May be love  is  a process  of sartu focusing? Can  it  be  so that the
previous phrase solves the centuries-old mystery?

     If we assume it is true well immediately  stop at the next problem. How
sartu is focused? What is the mechanism to aim the striving to happiness and
to hold  it  focused?  Nothing much to think  of, really.  Such mechanism of
capturing sartu expectations  and keeping them focused  are very well known.
Their names are inseparably tied with Love - they are Hope and Faith.
     Hope  clings to sartu qualities  of the object, its ideal qualities and
focuses sartu.  Faith hold  the  focus  and prevents the  subject to fly  to
another flower.
     Hope starts always from a  word, nice picture, a  promise. It is  quite
enough for to create hyperwish. But Faith needs deeds because it works  with
a  weakened,  satisfied  wish  and  has  to compensate  for  it  by vigorous
imitation  of  sartu environment (by  miracles, offerings,  gifts,  creating
comfort).
     But let us suppose that the object got tired of such imitation, stopped
generating the ideal  reality because it is  always  great  effort - and the
first step to the  loves end is done. Faith falters, focus shifts from  time
to time, but the feeling is far from spent.
     Optimal  hormonal  balance  is reluctant to peter  out, Hope strains to
maintain it,  clutches at any  phantom, any ghost  and mirage which helps to
anchor the aim and to hold the focus. Then the  last  mirage fades, focus is
totally lost and love comes to the end. Hope ceases to hold it, being itself
indication of its decline.

     Circle  is finished. The soul sees,  consciousness  certifies that  the
object of love has  lost all ideal sartu qualities. Faith has died. Hope  to
reach happiness is extinguished.  And the  burnt soul berths in stillness as
dried soil  awaiting  new  life-giving showers,  new disturbances,  powerful
hyperwishes. And if after such a shower a new sartu-charged  object  crosses
ones way capable to give promises and maintain  the level of promise  -  the
focusing of sartu can happen again.  The world will  again appear glittering
with Botticellis  colours. Or not. Then the human lot is pitiful. Devoid  of
focus,  unable  to find aim in the  entire Universe, burdened  with everyday
worries,  hastened  ahead  by trivial  needs you will  trudge towards  other
people. And they will meet you with hateful yells.



     It is time  to sum up. No matter who or where asks us about love,  even
in the middle of the night, we can not be taken unawares.  Be it the love to
money, God, woman, man  or whatever - it is the  aimed  at  a certain object
sartu.
     Love is the focused sartu.

     Laws of Human Attraction
     
       The next step is to check harmony  by algebra. It  is  not  enough to
define  love  in  the  sphere  of   humanities  (Physicists  still  consider
humanitarians just people  yielding to the temptation to abandon  themselves
to lyrical feelings, demonstrating but various stages of ignorance in "real"
sciences). That is why well try to formulate our findings in the form of  an
equation,  or rather  a  system of equations. Because there are  always  two
equations capable to describe love: the first is a description of Love-Hope,
and the second - Love-Faith.
     Love-Faith is always trivial  and basically uninteresting, that is  why
well pay maximum attention to the main equation of Love-Hope.


     3.2. Equation of Love Updating Freud

     We can not do without Freud. We shall use  the state of art elements of
human psyche, accepted by modern science: Ego, Id and Superego.
     Allow me to remind basic categories.
     "Ego"  is  a domain  of  consciousness,  the  intermediary between  the
unconscious  ("Id")  and  out-lying  reality,  including  social  structural
elements  which  coordinate  human  unconscious  with  a  concrete  reality,
expediency and  necessity.  "Ego"  is an unhappy  servant  of  two  masters,
darting between  "Id" craving pleasures  and strict commandments  regulating
family life, that of society and civilization.
     "Id" inhabits the domain of  the unconscious attractions; it is psychic
"core" of a person,  the  level of vague cravings, and the source of  energy
which moves all human activities.
     "Superego"  is conscience integrated into ones personality. The highest
court  which  judges according to  the norms  formed  at  the inter-personal
level.  Moral  censorship,  an  intermediary between unconscious drives  and
consciousness, settling  conflict  between  which couldnt  have  been solved
without  such interference.  Conscious  mind  leans on its support  when Ids
drives turn too  insistent and going too  far apart from cultural and social
lines.
     Correcting  the Freuds mistake  we  are  adding  as a  separate element
Intellect, without which all Freudian psychic organization remains "psychics
below the waist".
     The quality of consciousness  we shall consider as equal counterpart to
its form.

     World Law of Human Attraction. Equation of Love.

     L= V (Id)* I (Ego)/ S(Intellect) - N (Superego)

      Where:
     L - power of Love
     V  -  extent  of  Ids  excitement, power  of the  excited  unconscious,
hormonal push
     I - ideal component of the  real object, extent of sartu, the level  of
correlation  of the real object  to our aesthetic ideals and personal  sartu
expectations
     C - coefficient of Intellect
     N  - negative  component  of  the moral Superego,  the  left  uncovered
properties of the object which are contrary to the religious,  social, race,
national and other prejudices and prohibitions.
     Let us  remember  the origins of  Superego. Such as the traces left  by
fathers belt on ones tender behind.

     To our regret there  is no place enough to include neither the lemma of
equality which  brought  us to  the  present form of  the  equation, not the
details of the equations deduction. It is a subject for a separate book.

     Look again  at the equation - it  is  an outline of the immortal  human
soul. Having a formula let us make a first calculation.



      Here is estimation.
     Let us assume that each value is measured in points from 1 to 10.
     V (Id) for Romeo can be estimated as 10, considering hypersexuality  of
his age and Southern temper.
     I (Ego) - approximation to an ideal, Juliets extent of sartu for him is
also 10.
     C (Intellect) = 4. Romeos IQ was clearly quite average, 80-90 points of
usual scale.
     N (Superego) = 7. Blood feud,  hate did not manage to engulf the youths
soul entirely.

     L = 10*10/4 - 7 = 18
     Romeo loved Juliet with the power of 18 points. Under  stresses, when C
drastically diminishes, Love  grew stronger of course, which led  to a final
tragedy.

     The same equation can be used to calculate Love to God.


     3.3. Equation of God Ive seen a lot of this, this very world,
     A fool would be the one, who dreams the one beyond,
     Would think to meet ones double there
     And spends his life in the pursuit of ghost.
     Stand firmly on thy feet and exercise your talents.
     Cease building the Eternity in Heaven!
     This very world speaks multitude of tongues!

     I.Goethe "Faustus"

      Thus Spake History
      Continuing the Encyclopaedists tradition the 19th Century has answered
in  the question  "What is God",  general form.  It  firmly  placed machines
everywhere and led  to the  fore  of the historical stage a proud man. After
the emotional negation of God by Encyclopaedists, moving through the Faustus
ideal -  a free man on free land - Nietzsche arrived at his sacramental "God
is dead". Great power of Marxism worked to a large extent to  make this idea
to take root in the  enlightened minds.  But the  20th century very  quickly
cooled youthful  ardor  and  showed that Smerdyakovs in  absence  of  higher
Authority are capable  of unpronounceable deeds, which made again the  world
agree with usefulness of religions, notwithstanding the fact that they  very
often represent  a  symbiosis of happy clever  priests and  foolish  unhappy
wives.

     And a person looking for an intellectual truth is still darting between
two mirrors: on the one hand there is Nietzsche with his "God  is  dead", on
the other - Merezhkovsky and  Solzhenitsyn with their "people have forgotten
God, which led to all ills in the world".


       What can  absolute  materialism  say  about  God? At first  sight the
problem of God falls into two parts: God  the Creator and God the  Consoler,
God the Physicist and God  the Lyric, God - Creator of the Universe  and God
accepting our prayers. When Einstein was speaking about God  he was thinking
about  the Creator of  the  Universe  and  its laws.  When an illiterate and
hapless peasant  woman is speaking  about God,  she  is  speaking about  the
master of Eden. But there is practically no difference between them, really.
And Einstein does not differ in this aspect from the peasant woman.
     Another example. It is common knowledge that one  of the conditions  of
Prince Vladimir taking the Byzantine princess Ann as his  wife was accepting
of  Christianity in Russia, not the first  condition  though. One can assume
that if Vladimir  could have been drawn by another dame we could have  lived
with  a  different  faith.  But  such an  assumption doesnt stand  criticism
because we know from the Annals what was the advantage of Christianity  over
pagan  beliefs for our ancestors.  The  Christian  God  logically  and  with
consolation answered  two main questions  of the mind and  soul: how was the
world created and what will a person encounter after death.



      There can be no atheists in the trench.
     Saying

      Time came to remember the definition of sartu. It is transformation of
our wishes impossible to be  fulfilled  here  and now into the dreams  of  a
world, positively oriented towards a person, without dialectics and negative
feedback, where one  pleasure is  followed by  another  instead of hangover,
delights never dull and all our wishes come true absolutely free.
     What  have  we described  just now?  Absolute  happiness which  can  be
delivered  only by an  Absolute.  God is distilled sartu, placed by  a dream
beyond clouds. An attentive reader may ask: you say "Love is sartu", "Beauty
is sartu", "God is sartu". What is the difference?
     Existance. Here is  the answer. Existance... If  sartu in  charged with
existential  force  , if a  person tries  to solve  an  extremely  important
problem, such as the problem of life  and death, and contradictions pull him
apart, then existence  begins to push at the denominator in  the equation so
heavily and to blow numerator to such proportions  that it becomes  possible
to believe in anything.

     God = Sartu + Existance

     Here is a  simple and  clear equation of God. The nature of existential
problem does not matter -  be it a necessity to understand the reason of the
Universe or ordinary grief. This  makes grieving  peasant woman and Einstein
equal before the  sartu mechanism, but the  origin of  their problems urging
them  to seek  Absolute is different:  ontological  for  the peasant  woman,
epistemological  for the  scientist.  One  can not  but admire the universal
mechanism  of sartu  which  may  find  specific  way of  consolation for any
problem. Einsteins existance leads him to wish for an understandable  reason
explaining the world he investigates, to believe in wisdom of physical laws.
It  might explain  "strange"  religious  utterances  of  some  distinguished
scientists.

     Basic intellectual existance consists in the wish to get at the  reason
of all Universe , this wish evolved from the cause-and-consequence structure
of human thinking, as well as need for wisdom and reliability of cognition.

     Basic ontological existance is dread of death, wish of eternal life for
oneself and ones relatives.

     God  is an Absolute designed to console both our existances. God  is an
arm shake between mind and soul.

     Two main proofs of Gods existence  of Thomas Aquinas are based  just on
the abovementioned types of existance.

     Again it will be timely to remember our ancient Annals and the story of
Russias  Christianization. Our  ancestors preferred Christianity because  it
answered  in a very simple and consoling way two main questions: What is the
reason of this  World? What will  become with us after death? Both questions
were answered by  Christianity in compliance with human natures sartu, which
satisfied both Einsteins of the time and common people.


     3.4. Implementing  the Occams  Razor. Equation of  Love  exhaustively
explains why  the  monotheistic religions  managed  to conquer others in the
long run. Ancient  prophets understood  quite clearly the  critical role  of
reason in faith. With intellect as the denominator and skeptical  experience
of  the humankind as the numerator only an absolute devoid  of properties is
capable to mask its fairy-tale essence.
     Monotheism was suggested as a great answer to the eternal skepticism of
the mind  in the  15-12 centuries B.C. God was  put out  of the brackets  of
Nature and shielded from the attacks  of experience  and intellect. The next
step  was  to  get God  rid  of all the properties putting Him out from  the
critical bout.
     Napf Greek polytheism being too burdened with earthly  qualities (mount
Olympus)  could  not  stand  widening  of Ecumen  and  the sphere  of  human
interference with Nature. Monotheism stood its ground mainly due to removing
the object  of sartu focusing out of reach - beyond Nature and Universe. But
it is high time to penetrate there too.
     Equation of Love and  equation of God exhaust  emotional, psychological
side  of  religion and  provide for  its  possibility.  Social  practice  of
religions can be explained  by  their stabilizing and conserving role in the
society.  Thus it is proved: there is no God beyond the  existential  sartu.
God  is within soul.  More precisely  it  is sartu focusing of the existence
towards  the  mentally conceivable  absolute object. Depending  on climatic,
national, geographical, political and other conditions ruling elite  chooses
the concrete absolute object for the people to focus their sartu.
     We described the  sartu  model  of human  psychology.  Equation of Love
(including love  to God) was  deducted. It can be implemented to calculating
love towards the Creator.
     Occams  Razor  principle is against multiplying  unnecessary  entities.
Conclusion: if the sartu model of psyche is correct, then

     3.5. God does not exist.
     4. Job for  the  Creator Creator, move from your absolutely cold post
and step into Nature,  reject  the  amoral stance of the impartial judge and
master  of  your slaves. Come to the world and help us to carry the brunt of
the Universe. Return to the people in the image of God-like Humanity.
     God always returns.


     5.  Dostoyevskys fork.  Is sincere faith  possible? Godlike  Humanity
Atheism is Oedipus complex of the Humanity.
     One can remember Dostoyevskys thought that if he were to choose between
Truth and Christ  he would have chosen Christ.  But it  is important that he
came to  religion  through the  pending capital punishment,  that is through
absolute existance.

     To be or not to be? When such  a problem washes over you like the tenth
wave there are two possibilities: two  jab  the destiny that is  killing you
with its arrows by your sword, or, if you dont have any inclination to bring
forth  blood, just  to close  your  eyes,  switch  on the  sartu mechanisms,
understand and forgive everybody,  and dream sweet dreams. God is  the skill
to be happy in misfortune. God is the mechanism  to revert negative emotions
into love.
     To  believe  or  not  to  believe?  That  is  Dostoyevskys fork.  Sartu
mechanism  is  indispensable  to  guard human psyche  from misfortunes,  but
monotheistic God manages  this job worse and worse. It becomes more and more
difficult to trust him. The wish to believe in God clashes with the parental
directive that it is bad to tell lies, and often looses.
     Is  it possible to  believe  without  absolute lie,  is belief possible
without lies at all?
     Godlike Humanity.  World Mind - Aimer. Noospheric idea, Russian cosmism
in their  evolution to the absolute.  To replace the  absolute lie  with the
absolute purpose. No other way can be seen at present.
     Purpose - to grow noosphere to noouniverse. Aimer, Godlike Humanity and
noouniverse are synonyms here.
     To  join in the  global  Godlike  Humanity. To  strive  reaching  joint
Universe through absolute human aim instead of ancient fairy tale.
     Humankind should create new, better universes instead of moving towards
self-destruction in petty fights for meager plots of land urged by religious
fanaticism. God in such conflicts is the way to make people kill each other.

     6. An Absolute Testament
     6.1. Faith in Aimer. Outline. Two basic human existances are eternal.
They always will  be demanding an absolute object for  aiming at, to  focus.
Monotheism got obsolete in the  18t  century. In the Goethes Faustus God and
angels  choruses  seemed  obsolete. Though  Mephistopheles  appeared  almost
alive.
     The third Milennium should answer with its choice: Aimer (World Mind) -
Godlike Humanity - noouniverse.
     Philosophy should fortify them with absolute materialism.
     Dialectic materialism became obsolete because a person was left out.


      Scholar is not a mirror but a translator of poetry.

      World is a process of matter development.
     Space-time, cause-consequence, infinity-finality are forms of thought.
     Universes  are multiple.  The mechanism of self-emergence  of matter is
impossible in a single Universe.
     We shall ourselves create the world to live in.


      Absolute lie is substituted by  purpose. United Godlike  Humanity will
solve both existential problems in the process of its development.


      In order to avoid the necessity to introduce God as the creator of the
Universe we should build a model where matter brings it forth by itself from
nothing.
     This  model  is very  simple.  If we take a pair Universe-Anti-Universe
with time flowing in opposite directions and with Mer in each of  them, then
Aimer  of  our  Universe  will  create  Anti-Universe  while  Aimer  of  the
Anti-Universe  (Remai)  -  ours.  For  a detached observer it will  look  as
emergence  of  the  pair  World-  Antiworld out  of nothing. In  physics  of
elemental particles there is a full analogy  to this  process - emergence of
the pair electron-positron from vacuum.
     In this way  Aimers are creating universes and the possibility of their
own existence.  B. Spinozas notion of "existence in  itself, self-causality"
is implemented by pairs World-Antiworld, Aimer - Remai.



     Needs a genius.

     6.2. An Absolute Commandment. Improve matter.






Last-modified: Wed, 05 Nov 2003 08:01:54 GMT
Ocenite etot tekst: